Site Logo

Hello, you are using an old browser that's unsafe and no longer supported. Please consider updating your browser to a newer version, or downloading a modern browser.

G. K. Chesterton, early twentieth-century essayist, poet, novelist, political campaigner, and theologian, philosophized greatly about society and the future. A study of his thinking and selected writings, with particular reference to his status as a precursor of the genre later known as “science fiction,” enriches our understanding of how we came to be where we are and how we can advocate a better future.

In this book, Stephen R. L. Clark, a philosopher with a lifelong “addiction” to science fiction, explores Chesterton’s ideas and arguments in their historical context and evaluates them philosophically. He addresses Chesterton’s sense that the way things are is not how they must have been or need be in the future, and his willingness to face up to the apparent effects of the nihilism he detected in the science and politics of his day.

Clark offers a detailed study of some of Chesterton’s works that have been identified by science fiction writers and critics as seminal influences. He attempts to deal with some of Chesterton’s theories that have been found offensive or “positively wicked” by later writers and critics, including his arguments against female suffrage and in praise of war, his medievalist leanings, and his contemptuous rejection of Darwinian evolutionary theory.

“Chesterton worked to remind us of the oddity, the wonder, of the world we live in, by pointing up and exaggerating too-familiar features of that world,” comments Clark. “It is not necessary to agree with him on every issue to find his work invigorating and enlightening.” Chesterton’s approach to life and the world might be summarized as that of one who “thinks backward” or “looks at the world upside down,” acknowledging the often arbitrary nature of our customs and beliefs and also the underlying virtues of humanity. A philosophical analysis of this view provides insight into our past and the future we can shape.

Back to Tabs

Requesting an Exam Copy

Exam copies are sent to professors who would like to review the book before deciding whether to use it in a class. To request an exam copy, you must fill out the form below. It will automatically be sent to a staff member.

In our efforts to stay green, reduce expenses, and maintain scholarly accessibility, we are sending examination copies as electronic downloads in the Adobe Digital Edition format for a 90-day review period. If you have any trouble accessing the book in this format, please contact us and we will send a traditional copy of the book instead.

If you chose to review the electronic version of the book and adopt the book for one of your courses, upon notification by you or your bookstore, a traditional bound book will be sent to you free of charge.

Requesting a Desk Copy

Desk copies are complimentary books sent to professors who have already adopted the book for a course. To request a desk copy, please fill out the form below. It will automatically be sent to a staff member.

Proceed to Form

Back to Tabs

Preface / ix

Introduction / 3

Part I: What’s Wrong with Science Fiction? / 9

1. The Case against Science Fiction / 11

2. In Defense of Science Fiction / 18

Part II: The Texts / 39

3. The Napoleon of Notting Hill / 41

4. The Man Who Was Thursday / 50

5. The Ball and the Cross / 55

6. The Flying Inn / 65

7. The Distributist Rebellion / 73

8. The Return of Don Quixote / 76

Part III: The Themes / 83

9. Nationalists and Jews / 85

10. Women and Men / 97

11. Medievalism, War, and Men’s Ideals / 104

12. Distributism and Anarchy / 115

13. Darwinism, Scientific and Social / 124

14. Animals and the Royal Animal / 144

15. Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Virtue / 161

16. Miracles and Religion / 174

Conclusion: Thinking Backward / 187

Notes / 201

Index / 241

Back to Tabs